I’ll never forget Big D.
He was a rather big fellow (hence, “Big” D) with kin folk trailing all the way back to the Dalton Gang, legendary outlaws of the post-Civil War period. Needless to say, he was an interesting character, with quite an index of aphorismic phrases he’d picked up from his mother. One that stuck with me all these years was his mother’s explanation for why she and Big D’s father divorced when he was just a wee lad. All she would say was, “Well son, there’s (sic) three sides to the story. My side, his side, and the truth, and it’s the truth that’s the hardest to get at.”
I laughed out loud when he told me that, but the longer I let it soak into my brain, the more sobering the reality of it became, and my mind raced to the words of that gloomy old prophet Jeremiah who said, “The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked; who can know it?” (Jeremiah 17:9) If we are to believe Big D’s Mom, we can’t know it! We’re held so captive by our own sinful prejudices that our hearts fool us every time. It’s the primary reason I get cold chills whenever I hear advice like, “Follow your heart”, or “Let your heart be your guide.” If we are to believe Jeremiah then that advice will only lead us into trouble.
Having intellectually and experientially come to believe the old prophet, I cringe when the television show therapist asks the actor-patient, “And how does that make you feel?” I’m sitting there in my chair shouting at the TV, “Who cares how she feels! Just tell her the truth?” I know, I know, the therapist’s objective is to get her to realize the truth on her own, but don’t forget Jerry’s admonition that “The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked; who can know it?” If the old prophet is right, then how on earth can she get there on her own? Well, she can’t, but the good news is, there is a way, and interestingly enough, the “Good News” is that way.
The Bible is full of great wisdom and guidance to help us really learn and know the truth, things like “ . . . in the multitude of counselors there is safety.” (Proverbs 11:14), which takes us back to our TV therapist example; only find a therapist that’s actually going to tell you the truth!
Then there’s one of my favorites, “If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and unbraideth not; and it shall be given him. (James 1:5), and I emphasize that “ask of God” part. Counselors and therapists are humans, too, so their hearts aren’t any more pure than the rest of us, and the best of them make mistakes; but God . . . now there’s the resource for truth, and all we have to do is ask.
If you really want the truth, and you’re brave enough to ask (read James 1:6-8 for a better context of what I mean by “brave enough”), be ready, because the truth . . . not Big D’s Mom’s truth, or Big D’s Dad’s truth, but THE truth . . . is often quite a bit different that we think it is. I’ve seen people get so close to it that it started to hurt, and that’s when they walked away and continued to cling to “their” truth.
It takes a remarkable man or woman to acknowledge their own prejudices and misconceptions, and Big D’s Mom was certainly a remarkable woman; but it takes a miracle of grace find and accept the truth.
Fortunately, His grace is abundant.
Thursday, November 13, 2014
Sunday, June 1, 2014
Who Eactly are "They"?
Ever wonder who ‘they’ are?
I’m sure you’ve heard the old refrain, “You know what ‘they’ always say . . .” which of course is followed by some snappy little phrase ‘they’ supposedly always say. The more I hear about ‘they’, the less interested I am in the snappy little phrases, and the more interested I am in precisely who ‘they’ really are.
The same principle holds when we hear from ‘The White House’. Everyone knows that the Executive Mansion itself didn’t say anything, so who exactly in ‘The White House’ is making all of these pronouncements? If it’s the POTUS, then why not come right out and say so, because if it’s the butler, then who cares? (I suppose this way they can always say ‘The butler did it.’)
Then of course there’s ‘Congress’. A recent Gallup poll (bit.ly/SmY7xw) states that “Americans’ approval of Congress is 13% in April, inching down from 15% in March”, yet according to Charlie Mahtesian, writing for Politico (politi.co/U5ydA0), the 2012 reelection rate for Congress was 90%! How is this possible if the approval rate of Congress is hovering at near historic lows? Apparently, as Mr. Mahtesian says, “Voters hate Congress, but like their own member.”
When any one of us can either blame or take the word of the proverbial ‘they’ for what we believe is right or wrong at any given moment, or when an individual Congressperson can blame an entire institution for not leading and doing, or on the other hand for leading and doing but doing it badly, or the POTUS can blame an inanimate object for things he may or may not have said or believe, then it seems to me that personal responsibility has gone right out the window.
But none of this is new.
Some time or other between 55 and 56 . . . and no, I don’t mean between 1955 and 1956, but I really mean between 0055 and 0056 . . . the Apostle Paul got a letter, or some form of communique from the Board of Trustees of the First Church of Corinth, accusing him of deceiving them about his travel plans, of all things. (See 2 Corinthians 1:13-19 for some context. The New Living Translation is the easiest to follow this particular story line in my opinion.) These people must have been lied-to so often by the Corinthian political, business, and religious communities that they assumed Paul must be just like them, or at the very least Corinthian-lite. But the old evangelist makes it crystal clear that he leaves “nothing written between the lines and nothing you can’t understand.” (verse 13) It’s like they were reading and re-reading his letter, looking for what he really meant instead of what was plainly written, kind of like what we do when ‘They’ or ‘The White House’ or ‘The Congress’ runs all around the questions and never can quite say what ‘they’ really mean, leaving the rest of us scratching our heads, wondering.
But Paul wasn’t your typical religious whacko, spouting scary stories just to get people to kow-tow to his will, only to personally live differently than his congregations. He meant what he said, and he said what he meant, and he lived it every day . . . and so should we! (When you’re finished reading this article, read the entire first chapter of 2 Corinthians and you’ll have a better picture of this guy’s intentions.)
It’s the easiest thing in the world to blame our spouse, or our boss, or our parents, or a host of other ‘theys’ for our problems, but none of that will change our circumstances. We’ve become a society of victims, looking for someone, anyone but ourselves, to bear the burden of whatever current dilemma we face. “For Jesus Christ, the Son of God, does not waver between ‘Yes’ and ‘No’”, rather “he always does what he says.” (verse 19).
Again, so should we, and then take personal responsibility for the results.
I’m sure you’ve heard the old refrain, “You know what ‘they’ always say . . .” which of course is followed by some snappy little phrase ‘they’ supposedly always say. The more I hear about ‘they’, the less interested I am in the snappy little phrases, and the more interested I am in precisely who ‘they’ really are.
The same principle holds when we hear from ‘The White House’. Everyone knows that the Executive Mansion itself didn’t say anything, so who exactly in ‘The White House’ is making all of these pronouncements? If it’s the POTUS, then why not come right out and say so, because if it’s the butler, then who cares? (I suppose this way they can always say ‘The butler did it.’)
Then of course there’s ‘Congress’. A recent Gallup poll (bit.ly/SmY7xw) states that “Americans’ approval of Congress is 13% in April, inching down from 15% in March”, yet according to Charlie Mahtesian, writing for Politico (politi.co/U5ydA0), the 2012 reelection rate for Congress was 90%! How is this possible if the approval rate of Congress is hovering at near historic lows? Apparently, as Mr. Mahtesian says, “Voters hate Congress, but like their own member.”
When any one of us can either blame or take the word of the proverbial ‘they’ for what we believe is right or wrong at any given moment, or when an individual Congressperson can blame an entire institution for not leading and doing, or on the other hand for leading and doing but doing it badly, or the POTUS can blame an inanimate object for things he may or may not have said or believe, then it seems to me that personal responsibility has gone right out the window.
But none of this is new.
Some time or other between 55 and 56 . . . and no, I don’t mean between 1955 and 1956, but I really mean between 0055 and 0056 . . . the Apostle Paul got a letter, or some form of communique from the Board of Trustees of the First Church of Corinth, accusing him of deceiving them about his travel plans, of all things. (See 2 Corinthians 1:13-19 for some context. The New Living Translation is the easiest to follow this particular story line in my opinion.) These people must have been lied-to so often by the Corinthian political, business, and religious communities that they assumed Paul must be just like them, or at the very least Corinthian-lite. But the old evangelist makes it crystal clear that he leaves “nothing written between the lines and nothing you can’t understand.” (verse 13) It’s like they were reading and re-reading his letter, looking for what he really meant instead of what was plainly written, kind of like what we do when ‘They’ or ‘The White House’ or ‘The Congress’ runs all around the questions and never can quite say what ‘they’ really mean, leaving the rest of us scratching our heads, wondering.
But Paul wasn’t your typical religious whacko, spouting scary stories just to get people to kow-tow to his will, only to personally live differently than his congregations. He meant what he said, and he said what he meant, and he lived it every day . . . and so should we! (When you’re finished reading this article, read the entire first chapter of 2 Corinthians and you’ll have a better picture of this guy’s intentions.)
It’s the easiest thing in the world to blame our spouse, or our boss, or our parents, or a host of other ‘theys’ for our problems, but none of that will change our circumstances. We’ve become a society of victims, looking for someone, anyone but ourselves, to bear the burden of whatever current dilemma we face. “For Jesus Christ, the Son of God, does not waver between ‘Yes’ and ‘No’”, rather “he always does what he says.” (verse 19).
Again, so should we, and then take personal responsibility for the results.
Sunday, February 23, 2014
The Use & Misuse of Capital
“ . . . the Kingdom of Heaven can be illustrated by the story of a man going on a long trip. He called together his servants and entrusted his money to them while he was gone. He gave five bags of silver to one, two bags of silver to another, and one bag of silver to the last—dividing it in proportion to their abilities. He then left on his trip. The servant who received the five bags of silver began to invest the money and earned five more. The servant with two bags of silver also went to work and earned two more. But the servant who received the one bag of silver dug a hole in the ground and hid the master’s money. After a long time their master returned from his trip and called them to give an account of how they had used his money. The servant to whom he had entrusted the five bags of silver came forward with five more and said, ‘Master, you gave me five bags of silver to invest, and I have earned five more.’ The master was full of praise. ‘Well done, my good and faithful servant. You have been faithful in handling this small amount, so now I will give you many more responsibilities. Let’s celebrate together!’ The servant who had received the two bags of silver came forward and said, ‘Master, you gave me two bags of silver to invest, and I have earned two more.’ The master said, ‘Well done, my good and faithful servant. You have been faithful in handling this small amount, so now I will give you many more responsibilities. Let’s celebrate together!’ Then the servant with the one bag of silver came and said, ‘Master, I knew you were a harsh man, harvesting crops you didn’t plant and gathering crops you didn’t cultivate. I was afraid I would lose your money, so I hid it in the earth. Look, here is your money back.’ But the master replied, ‘You wicked and lazy servant! If you knew I harvested crops I didn’t plant and gathered crops I didn’t cultivate, why didn’t you deposit my money in the bank? At least I could have gotten some interest on it.’ Then he ordered, ‘Take the money from this servant, and give it to the one with the ten bags of silver. To those who use well what they are given, even more will be given, and they will have an abundance. But from those who do nothing, even what little they have will be taken away.’”
Matthew 25:14-29, NLT
It would be hard to find a more classic, biblical example of the use and, yes, the misuse of capital. To be sure, the underlying principle here is a spiritual one; however, Jesus again and again uses financial principles throughout the Gospels to illustrate the spiritual. The lesson here is two-fold: take what God has given you, be it a little or a lot, and maximize His gifts to their fullest potential, and “To those who use well what they are given, even more will be given, and they will have an abundance.” Invest wisely, and you will reap the rewards, spiritually and financially. Unfortunately, results of the fearful side of human nature are also forecast. “But from those who do nothing, even what little they have will be taken away.” Sit around and watch television all evening, spend everything you earn, and never think about tomorrow but simply live for today and you’ll end up with nothing, spiritually and financially.
Matthew 25:14-29, NLT
It would be hard to find a more classic, biblical example of the use and, yes, the misuse of capital. To be sure, the underlying principle here is a spiritual one; however, Jesus again and again uses financial principles throughout the Gospels to illustrate the spiritual. The lesson here is two-fold: take what God has given you, be it a little or a lot, and maximize His gifts to their fullest potential, and “To those who use well what they are given, even more will be given, and they will have an abundance.” Invest wisely, and you will reap the rewards, spiritually and financially. Unfortunately, results of the fearful side of human nature are also forecast. “But from those who do nothing, even what little they have will be taken away.” Sit around and watch television all evening, spend everything you earn, and never think about tomorrow but simply live for today and you’ll end up with nothing, spiritually and financially.
Friday, February 7, 2014
Incentives
“‘Have you seen the giant?’ the men were asking. ‘He comes out each day to challenge Israel. And have you heard about the huge reward the king has offered to anyone who kills him? The king will give him one of his daughters for a wife, and his whole family will be exempted from paying taxes!’”
I Samuel 17:25, NLT
Talk about an incentive program! Kill the giant and get the King’s daughter and tax exemption for the rest of your life. It’s got me looking for a sling and five smooth stones myself.
The first King of Israel understood the power of incentives more than 1,000 years before God became a man via The Man Christ Jesus. What really fascinates me about this story is that only one person took advantage of the King’s incentive program. Sure, there were risks in the King’s proposal, but there were also huge rewards for the successful, and David was determined to be successful.
He was no fool, but realized that conventional methods weren’t the answer for this job. Here was a man, wise beyond his years, smart enough to not believe it couldn’t be done, but instead looked for new methods for Giant Killing. The old ways weren’t working anymore, but that didn’t mean it couldn’t be done. He just had to figure out how, and figure it out he did.
It’s amazing what the right incentives just might inspire us to accomplish.
I Samuel 17:25, NLT
Talk about an incentive program! Kill the giant and get the King’s daughter and tax exemption for the rest of your life. It’s got me looking for a sling and five smooth stones myself.
The first King of Israel understood the power of incentives more than 1,000 years before God became a man via The Man Christ Jesus. What really fascinates me about this story is that only one person took advantage of the King’s incentive program. Sure, there were risks in the King’s proposal, but there were also huge rewards for the successful, and David was determined to be successful.
He was no fool, but realized that conventional methods weren’t the answer for this job. Here was a man, wise beyond his years, smart enough to not believe it couldn’t be done, but instead looked for new methods for Giant Killing. The old ways weren’t working anymore, but that didn’t mean it couldn’t be done. He just had to figure out how, and figure it out he did.
It’s amazing what the right incentives just might inspire us to accomplish.
Thursday, December 5, 2013
Reimagining Man and the Corvette
While standing in the lobby of R & M’s New & Used Tire store recently, waiting for a diagnosis of a leaking tire, I picked up the most recent copy of Automobile Magazine and was drawn to the article, 2014 Man of the Year: Tadge Juechter. (http://www.automobilemag.com/features/awards/1401_2014_man_of_the_year_tadge_juechter/)
You need to read the article in order to get the full story, but Mr. Juechter is the Chief Engineer at Corvette, and what captured my attention was that he didn’t merely tweak what was an already pretty tweaked-out design. Instead, according to the article, “the C7 is a top-to-bottom reimagining of what the Corvette could and should be.”
The original Corvette, introduced in 1953, was a gorgeous automobile, all 300 or so of that first production year being white with a red interior. Unfortunately the engine and transmission had a lot to be desired, and it looked as though the Corvette would be a short lived experiment until the Russian born engineer Zora Arkus-Duntov got hold of it. He transformed this beautiful design with its wimpy power train into the powerful V8, stick shift that became the C1 series of Corvettes. For better or worse, there have been a lot of iterations since, but many aficionados will tell you that there hasn’t been anything to compare to the Halcyon Days of the C1 . . . until now!
Maybe it’s my relatively recent obsession with sports cars, or maybe a couple of wires in my brain got crossed up back in my Bible College days, but as we enter into the Advent season, this makes me think of what Jesus was, and is, all about.
Bear with me.
If we go back to the very beginning when “God created the heaven and the earth”, we find the barest hint of how everything got started. The Hebrew word translated “God” here in Genesis 1:1 is “Elohim”, which is a plural word and the earliest suggestion of the Trinity, thus when God says “Let US make man in OUR image” (Genesis 1:26), I get a picture in my head of God-The-Father, God-The-Son, and God-The-Spirit sitting around the proverbial conference table planning and executing the entire creation process, which did indeed turn out to be a beautiful thing. As a matter of fact, God either said or saw that “it was good” no less than seven times during the creation process, so He was unquestionably happy with this successful beginning.
But this very successful beginning quickly went awry when the apple of God’s eye thought they were smarter than God and decided to ignore His “advise” and do their own thing; thus, the original tweaking process of the very first Great Design begins. To make a rather long and historic story short, God called a man (Abraham) who established a people (Israel) with whom a series of rather complicated rules and regulations were established, which presumably were intended to tweak this race of people back into the famous original that God had intended in the first place. By now we realize that didn’t work out so well. Then again, God being God, He knew all along that it wouldn’t, but was using the tweaking process to prepare the people for the “reimagining of what [man] could and should be”, that “man” being the last Adam (1 Corinthians 15:45), Jesus, His Son.
Now to the theo-purists out there, please don’t confuse my crude analogy with hard and fast theology, but I do ask that you observe the parallels. The millennia of tweaking God was doing all that time was merely working mankind up to His true great imagining, Jesus Christ. While I’m certain that the masters of General Motors were never so prescient as to have planned Corvette’s tweaking years in order to prepare the way for Mr. Juechter, God’s so called tweaking years were precisely planned to prepare the way for Jesus.
God’s great imagining has been revealed, but don’t just stand at the Nativity and ooo and ahhh like you would at a car show, but let Him inside your heart . . . then fasten your seat belt, and enjoy the ride of your life!
You need to read the article in order to get the full story, but Mr. Juechter is the Chief Engineer at Corvette, and what captured my attention was that he didn’t merely tweak what was an already pretty tweaked-out design. Instead, according to the article, “the C7 is a top-to-bottom reimagining of what the Corvette could and should be.”
The original Corvette, introduced in 1953, was a gorgeous automobile, all 300 or so of that first production year being white with a red interior. Unfortunately the engine and transmission had a lot to be desired, and it looked as though the Corvette would be a short lived experiment until the Russian born engineer Zora Arkus-Duntov got hold of it. He transformed this beautiful design with its wimpy power train into the powerful V8, stick shift that became the C1 series of Corvettes. For better or worse, there have been a lot of iterations since, but many aficionados will tell you that there hasn’t been anything to compare to the Halcyon Days of the C1 . . . until now!
Maybe it’s my relatively recent obsession with sports cars, or maybe a couple of wires in my brain got crossed up back in my Bible College days, but as we enter into the Advent season, this makes me think of what Jesus was, and is, all about.
Bear with me.
If we go back to the very beginning when “God created the heaven and the earth”, we find the barest hint of how everything got started. The Hebrew word translated “God” here in Genesis 1:1 is “Elohim”, which is a plural word and the earliest suggestion of the Trinity, thus when God says “Let US make man in OUR image” (Genesis 1:26), I get a picture in my head of God-The-Father, God-The-Son, and God-The-Spirit sitting around the proverbial conference table planning and executing the entire creation process, which did indeed turn out to be a beautiful thing. As a matter of fact, God either said or saw that “it was good” no less than seven times during the creation process, so He was unquestionably happy with this successful beginning.
But this very successful beginning quickly went awry when the apple of God’s eye thought they were smarter than God and decided to ignore His “advise” and do their own thing; thus, the original tweaking process of the very first Great Design begins. To make a rather long and historic story short, God called a man (Abraham) who established a people (Israel) with whom a series of rather complicated rules and regulations were established, which presumably were intended to tweak this race of people back into the famous original that God had intended in the first place. By now we realize that didn’t work out so well. Then again, God being God, He knew all along that it wouldn’t, but was using the tweaking process to prepare the people for the “reimagining of what [man] could and should be”, that “man” being the last Adam (1 Corinthians 15:45), Jesus, His Son.
Now to the theo-purists out there, please don’t confuse my crude analogy with hard and fast theology, but I do ask that you observe the parallels. The millennia of tweaking God was doing all that time was merely working mankind up to His true great imagining, Jesus Christ. While I’m certain that the masters of General Motors were never so prescient as to have planned Corvette’s tweaking years in order to prepare the way for Mr. Juechter, God’s so called tweaking years were precisely planned to prepare the way for Jesus.
God’s great imagining has been revealed, but don’t just stand at the Nativity and ooo and ahhh like you would at a car show, but let Him inside your heart . . . then fasten your seat belt, and enjoy the ride of your life!
Friday, October 18, 2013
Values or Preferences?
When are our values real, honest to goodness values, and at what point do they become merely personal preferences? Do we understand the difference?
In 1763 Patrick Henry made it pretty clear that he understood the difference. Arguing the famed Parson's Cause in Hanover County, Virgina, Patrick Henry proclaimed that, by ignoring their elected representatives, King George was "a tyrant who forfeits the allegiance of his subjects." Henry ratcheted up his inflammatory speech to the point of treason, in some peoples’ minds, when defending his resolutions against the Stamp Act in the House of Burgesses on May 30, 1765.
Later, in March of 1775, Henry urged his fellow Virginians to arm in self-defense, closing his appeal with those immortal words, "I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death."
Governor Henry understood the difference.
More than 150 years later, just two days after Adolf Hitler was installed as Chancellor of Germany, Lutheran pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer attacked the “fuhrer” (leader) by calling him the “verfuhrer” (mis-leader), or as some translate it, the “seducer”, on one of his regular radio broadcasts. That broadcast was cut off in mid-sentence, and The Dietrich Bonhoeffer Show was history.
Bonhoeffer was the first, clear voice calling for the church to resist Hitler’s persecution of the Jews, declaring plainly that the church cannot merely "bandage the victims under the wheel, but jam the spoke in the wheel itself."
Pastor Bonhoeffer understood the difference.
Just recently Franciscan University of Steubenville, Ohio made it pretty clear that they understood the difference when they announced that they would be dropping their student health insurance program because of the federal mandate that these plans must include contraceptive coverage. Agree or disagree with this deeply held value, one thing is crystal clear; the sanctity of life, or at least their clearly articulated definition of life, is indeed a value, and not merely a preference to Franciscan University.
Eastern Ohio’s Franciscan University understands the difference.
Now you may think that Franciscan University’s decision is pretty timid when compared to the likes of Patrick Henry’s and Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s decisions, and that may well be so. I leave all that for history to decide. But this isn’t about whether or not one person’s values are bigger, or greater, or more important than the other. It’s a matter of whether or not the principles that we say we hold dear are real, honest to goodness values, or just personal preferences.
I prefer premium, homemade-style ice cream over soft-serve, but I’ll eat soft serve. I prefer one of Shaw’s famous apple smoked pork shops over a Big Mac, but I’ll still eat a Big Mac . . . if I’m really, really hungry, and the alternatives are . . . well, you get the picture. Preferences are plentiful, and they’re relatively harmless no matter which way you go with them. Values . . . that is living up to our values . . . is hard work.
I pray we’re up to it.
In 1763 Patrick Henry made it pretty clear that he understood the difference. Arguing the famed Parson's Cause in Hanover County, Virgina, Patrick Henry proclaimed that, by ignoring their elected representatives, King George was "a tyrant who forfeits the allegiance of his subjects." Henry ratcheted up his inflammatory speech to the point of treason, in some peoples’ minds, when defending his resolutions against the Stamp Act in the House of Burgesses on May 30, 1765.
Later, in March of 1775, Henry urged his fellow Virginians to arm in self-defense, closing his appeal with those immortal words, "I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death."
Governor Henry understood the difference.
More than 150 years later, just two days after Adolf Hitler was installed as Chancellor of Germany, Lutheran pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer attacked the “fuhrer” (leader) by calling him the “verfuhrer” (mis-leader), or as some translate it, the “seducer”, on one of his regular radio broadcasts. That broadcast was cut off in mid-sentence, and The Dietrich Bonhoeffer Show was history.
Bonhoeffer was the first, clear voice calling for the church to resist Hitler’s persecution of the Jews, declaring plainly that the church cannot merely "bandage the victims under the wheel, but jam the spoke in the wheel itself."
Pastor Bonhoeffer understood the difference.
Just recently Franciscan University of Steubenville, Ohio made it pretty clear that they understood the difference when they announced that they would be dropping their student health insurance program because of the federal mandate that these plans must include contraceptive coverage. Agree or disagree with this deeply held value, one thing is crystal clear; the sanctity of life, or at least their clearly articulated definition of life, is indeed a value, and not merely a preference to Franciscan University.
Eastern Ohio’s Franciscan University understands the difference.
Now you may think that Franciscan University’s decision is pretty timid when compared to the likes of Patrick Henry’s and Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s decisions, and that may well be so. I leave all that for history to decide. But this isn’t about whether or not one person’s values are bigger, or greater, or more important than the other. It’s a matter of whether or not the principles that we say we hold dear are real, honest to goodness values, or just personal preferences.
I prefer premium, homemade-style ice cream over soft-serve, but I’ll eat soft serve. I prefer one of Shaw’s famous apple smoked pork shops over a Big Mac, but I’ll still eat a Big Mac . . . if I’m really, really hungry, and the alternatives are . . . well, you get the picture. Preferences are plentiful, and they’re relatively harmless no matter which way you go with them. Values . . . that is living up to our values . . . is hard work.
I pray we’re up to it.
Thursday, October 17, 2013
The more things change....the more they stay the same....
It seems like just
yesterday that the Chicken Littles of this world were running around yelling “Y2K,
The Sky is Falling, Y2K, The Sky is Falling.” As hard as it is for me to believe,
that was more than ten years ago now and, interestingly enough, the sky did not fall and
the world did not come to an end.
To give you an idea of how old I am, I can even remember clear back to the days of double digit inflation, double digit unemployment, a demoralized and underfunded military, international humiliation at the hands of radical, middle-eastern terrorists, and . . . wait a minute . . . other than double digit inflation (and hold onto your wallets, folks, because that’s coming soon) doesn’t this sound vaguely familiar? While the world has certainly changed from those days to now, the old French proverb still rings true; Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose . . . The more things change, the more they stay the same.
If the oft repeated words of philosopher George Santanyana, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it” (The Life of Reason, Volume 1, 1905) are true, then why are things fundamentally la même chose? At the risk of personally coming across as both arrogant and ignorant, may I suggest two possible reasons? Arrogance and ignorance.
In our “We’re-all-evolving-into-a-higher-state-of-consciousness” culture, each succeeding generation seems to think it’s a wee bit smarter and a whole lot wiser than previous generations. My grandbaby is smarter than my daughter, my daughter is smarter than me, I’m smarter than my Dad, who is smarter than his Dad, ad infinitum. We’re inundated with this stuff by science fiction writers. You can’t watch a Star Trek rerun without getting bombarded by how stupid we are and how smart everyone is three centuries later. They’re all the time moralizing about how much more evolved they are in those shows compared to the pathetic state of mankind in the late 20thCentury. Right! They’ve evolved to the point they’ve stopped killing fellow human beings and are just killing Klingons and Romulans.
If they only meant technologically, I could go along with it, but they mean a whole lot more than that. These people actually believe that three hundred years from now it’s going to be all peace, love, and rock’n roll, that man is actually going to evolve into some higher state, and self interests will be a thing of the past. Such arrogance is not only insulting, it’s mind boggling.
I don’t remember the context of the conversation, but I remember telling an English teacher of mine back when I was still in high school that he was smarter than me. I suppose I was probably discouraged about goofing up some composition paper or something, and he looked at me and said, “We really don’t know that. I’m more educated than you, but neither of us knows who is smarter than the other.” His education clearly gave him an edge, even though I might have been the smartest one of the two of us.
I’ve been involved in higher education of one form or the other for more than 20 years and, I can tell you, it does give you an edge; however, unfortunately for some, education hasn’t done anything to temper their arrogance. If anything, it’s made some even more arrogant. All too often getting a degree in Widget Technology, or whatever, somehow tends to make one think s/he’s somehow smarter than the ignorant masses in just about everything. So education in and of itself is not the solution to arrogance and ignorance.
The wisest person that ever lived, other than our Lord, said it best. Having lived a life of fabulous luxury, bringing his country to and through her golden years, ushering in an era of unprecedented peace, prosperity, and safety for his people, the aging King Solomon paced back and forth in the throne room dictating his memoirs said to his scribe said, “Here is my final conclusion: fear God and obey His commands, for this is the duty of every person.” (Ecclesiastes 12:13, NLT)
The more things change, the more that underlying principle stays precisely the same.
To give you an idea of how old I am, I can even remember clear back to the days of double digit inflation, double digit unemployment, a demoralized and underfunded military, international humiliation at the hands of radical, middle-eastern terrorists, and . . . wait a minute . . . other than double digit inflation (and hold onto your wallets, folks, because that’s coming soon) doesn’t this sound vaguely familiar? While the world has certainly changed from those days to now, the old French proverb still rings true; Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose . . . The more things change, the more they stay the same.
If the oft repeated words of philosopher George Santanyana, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it” (The Life of Reason, Volume 1, 1905) are true, then why are things fundamentally la même chose? At the risk of personally coming across as both arrogant and ignorant, may I suggest two possible reasons? Arrogance and ignorance.
In our “We’re-all-evolving-into-a-higher-state-of-consciousness” culture, each succeeding generation seems to think it’s a wee bit smarter and a whole lot wiser than previous generations. My grandbaby is smarter than my daughter, my daughter is smarter than me, I’m smarter than my Dad, who is smarter than his Dad, ad infinitum. We’re inundated with this stuff by science fiction writers. You can’t watch a Star Trek rerun without getting bombarded by how stupid we are and how smart everyone is three centuries later. They’re all the time moralizing about how much more evolved they are in those shows compared to the pathetic state of mankind in the late 20thCentury. Right! They’ve evolved to the point they’ve stopped killing fellow human beings and are just killing Klingons and Romulans.
If they only meant technologically, I could go along with it, but they mean a whole lot more than that. These people actually believe that three hundred years from now it’s going to be all peace, love, and rock’n roll, that man is actually going to evolve into some higher state, and self interests will be a thing of the past. Such arrogance is not only insulting, it’s mind boggling.
I don’t remember the context of the conversation, but I remember telling an English teacher of mine back when I was still in high school that he was smarter than me. I suppose I was probably discouraged about goofing up some composition paper or something, and he looked at me and said, “We really don’t know that. I’m more educated than you, but neither of us knows who is smarter than the other.” His education clearly gave him an edge, even though I might have been the smartest one of the two of us.
I’ve been involved in higher education of one form or the other for more than 20 years and, I can tell you, it does give you an edge; however, unfortunately for some, education hasn’t done anything to temper their arrogance. If anything, it’s made some even more arrogant. All too often getting a degree in Widget Technology, or whatever, somehow tends to make one think s/he’s somehow smarter than the ignorant masses in just about everything. So education in and of itself is not the solution to arrogance and ignorance.
The wisest person that ever lived, other than our Lord, said it best. Having lived a life of fabulous luxury, bringing his country to and through her golden years, ushering in an era of unprecedented peace, prosperity, and safety for his people, the aging King Solomon paced back and forth in the throne room dictating his memoirs said to his scribe said, “Here is my final conclusion: fear God and obey His commands, for this is the duty of every person.” (Ecclesiastes 12:13, NLT)
The more things change, the more that underlying principle stays precisely the same.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)